SERVER : Linux us-phx-web1140.main-hosting.eu 4.18.0-513.11.1.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 18 16:21:02 UTC 2024 x86_64
IP     : 92.112.198.248
PWD    : /home/u182381751/domains/cryptotokentracker.com/public_html

Name Type Actions
app Directory Rename | Remove
bootstrap Directory Rename | Remove
config Directory Rename | Remove
database Directory Rename | Remove
documentation Directory Rename | Remove
hooks Directory Rename | Remove
public Directory Rename | Remove
resources Directory Rename | Remove
revision-updates Directory Rename | Remove
routes Directory Rename | Remove
sitemap Directory Rename | Remove
storage Directory Rename | Remove
tests Directory Rename | Remove
vendor Directory Rename | Remove
.env File Edit | Rename | Remove
.htaccess File Edit | Rename | Remove
ads.txt File Edit | Rename | Remove
artisan File Edit | Rename | Remove
composer.json File Edit | Rename | Remove
default.php File Edit | Rename | Remove
index.php File Edit | Rename | Remove
qing.php File Edit | Rename | Remove
robots.txt File Edit | Rename | Remove
zj.zip File Edit | Rename | Remove
Jameson Lopp sounds alarm on Bitcoin address poisoning attacks
Crypto Token Tracker logo Crypto Token Tracker logo
CoinTelegraph 2025-04-06 22:09:41

Jameson Lopp sounds alarm on Bitcoin address poisoning attacks

Jameson Lopp, the chief security officer at Bitcoin ( BTC ) custody company Casa, sounded the alarm on Bitcoin address poisoning attacks, a social engineering scam that uses similar addresses from a victim's transaction history to fool them into sending funds to the malicious address. According to Lopp's Feb 6 article , the threat actors generate BTC addresses that match the first and last digits of addresses from the victim's transaction history. Lopp analyzed the Bitcoin blockchain history for this type of attack and found: "The first such transactions did not appear until block 797570, July 7, 2023, which had 36 such transactions. Then, all was quiet until block 819455, December 12, 2023, after which we can find regular bursts of these transactions up until block 881172, January 28, 2025, then there was a 2-month break before they started up again." "Over these 18 months, just shy of 48,000 transactions were sent that match this profile of potential address poisoning," Lopp added. Example of a poisoned address attack. Source: J ameson Lopp The executive urged Bitcoin holders to thoroughly check addresses before sending funds and called for better wallet interfaces that fully display addresses. Lopp's warning highlights the emerging cybersecurity exploits and fraudulent schemes plaguing the industry. Related: Crypto exploit, scam losses drop to $28.8M in March after February spike Address poisoning scams and exploits claim billions in stolen user funds According to cybersecurity firm Cyvers , over $1.2 million was stolen through address poisoning attacks in March 2025. Cyvers CEO Deddy Lavid said these types of attacks cost users $1.8 million in February. Blockchain security firm PeckShield estimates the total amount lost to crypto hacks in Q1 2025 to be over $1.6 billion, with the Bybit hack accounting for the vast majority of the stolen funds. The Bybit hack in February was responsible for $1.4 billion in losses and represents the biggest crypto hack in history . Cybersecurity experts have tied the attacks to North Korean state-affiliated hackers that use complex and evolving social engineering schemes to steal cryptocurrencies and sensitive data from targets. Common Lazarus Group social engineering scams include fraudulent job offers, zoom meetings with fake venture capitalists, and phishing scams on social media. Magazine: 2 auditors miss $27M Penpie flaw, Pythia’s ‘claim rewards’ bug: Crypto-Sec

Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.